It's Time to Practise Better Medicine

This article from @KathyKrostof on CBS got me thinking this week. Although as physicians we're no strangers to the art of complaining, it does appear that things are really getting strained out there on the front line. Talking to friends and colleagues from many different disciplines much of the frustration seems to stem from not being able to practise the sort of medicine we want to, and indeed signed up for when we first entered medical school. Too little time with our patients, over burdensome paperwork, a disjointed system where half the time we are in the dark as to what's happening with our patients outside of the office. I know I have to frequently spend significant amounts of time trying to piece together what's been happening with patients who see other specialists in different institutions; usually by wading through a disorderly pile of faxes or letters. This isn't medicine as it should be, this is fire fighting and disaster aversion. I am constantly amazed at how backward we have been, and to some extent continue to be, in how we practice medicine and deliver care.

This blog posting by @GertiTechBlog speaks volumes about the challenges faced by many of us, especially those working in primary care. And it is my feeling that the reason many physicians are feeling unhappy at the moment is not because they've fallen out of love with the practise of medicine, rather it is increasingly frustrating trying to do a good job.

Technology has transformed many aspects of our lives. It is sometimes hard to remember that we used to have to go to a travel agency to book a flight or a vacation, or go to a book store to buy something to read. Many of us now have complete control of our finances and bank accounts via the Internet and hardly ever have to visit a branch. Yet the practice of medicine has hardly changed during the time that this revolution has occurred in other areas of our lives. Why is this?

Part of the problem is undoubtedly the fact that as providers of care we have been extremely reticent to adopt new ways of doing things, preferring the status quo of the way its always been done. It wasn't a desire to practise better medicine that drove the uptake of electronic health records, it was the huge amounts of Federal incentives that made it happen. It really is very curious that it should take what is ostensibly a "bribe" from the government to do something positive, rather than taking it upon ourselves to enhance how we practise. Of course there is the debate that EHRs have not actually made the practise of medicine more efficient, cost effective or better...but that's a topic for another discussion!

Perhaps if we spent a little time looking at how other industries have developed and utilized technology over the past decade we could get some ideas on how we could improve what we do. I really do believe that the intelligent use of technology in our day-to-day interactions with patients and colleagues has the potential to improve how we feel about our jobs and also enhance our patients' satisfaction with the care we provide.

It's no secret that most major vendors of products and services have highly sophisticated customer retention and loyalty programs. They want to stay close to their customers, recommend other services that may interest them and find out what they think about what they've received to date. Now this is not a direct analogy with delivering medical care, but there are probably some aspects that still hold true. How difficult would it be for us to inquire from our patients how they are doing, what they thought of their last healthcare interaction and whether they were on track to reach the goals agreed on their last visit? Using traditional face-to-face interaction would probably prove quite difficult (or at least time consuming) for this, however, this is where technology can help and it is where the likes of Amazon, Expedia and Hilton, to name but a few, have excelled in driving loyalty and trust.

We need to think differently about how we deliver healthcare in the second decade of the twenty-first century. Storing information in an EHR is just the beginning, there are so many other ways we can interact and influence our patients in a positive fashion. Those of us who grasp this challenge, I believe, will drive better outcomes and greater value; two facets that are going to be integral to the future of healthcare.

nGage Health's patient timeline where all interactions with the healthcare system are graphically displayed for ease of review by both patient and provider.

Wearable and Cool

I've spent a lot of the last week reading reviews and watching videos from the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas. Unfortunately I wasn't able to make it out west, but that didn't actually matter too much with the amount of commentary that was coming out of the show in pretty much real time. This was the first time that I can remember that I really felt like I was immersed in a "real world" event while physically being more than a thousand miles away. Now clearly it's not going to be quite the same as being there in person (canapés and a cocktail on your own isn't that much fun!), but the sheer depth and breadth of the commentary coming out of the event from people who were there was astounding.

It seemed from the outside that healthtech and wearable tech were big items at this years show, with companies big and small previewing their new offerings. This infographic from the organizers seems to confirm this, with these two areas coming in first and fourth in terms of volume of mentions on social media.

As an organization that harnesses data from wearable devices and apps, and makes this data usable for healthcare providers, this is obviously great news for us. It appears that there is growing interest in self-monitoring and quantification and it seems unlikely that the large tech companies would be putting in so much time and effort into creating new and improved devices if they didn't see a real market for them.

Having said this I have got he impression that the majority of the devices are variations on a theme; physical activity, sleep and nutrition.This discussion thread on the Digital Health group on LinkedIn started by @BillVick calls for more diverse offerings. I do tend to agree. Although the data from continuous monitoring of activity and sleep patterns is extremely valuable there are so many other parameters that would augment this data and provide real insight to both the individual and their provider of care.

Of course there is the gray area between what constitutes a medical device and what is a consumer product. Falling foul of the FDA is not something anyone wants to do, especially in the light of the recent 23AndMe episode. However, with the pace of change in the industry seemingly accelerating to "warp speed" I am sure it is not going to be long before a consumer will be able to measure and monitor pretty much any parameter that their physician can. With this I truly believe there will come great opportunities to improve the health of the population, reduce the cost of delivering healthcare and make sure our patients (read clients) are satisfied.

Example of how the nGage Health platform presents data from a population using different devices to track physical activity.  

Health Engine Optimization

I recently read this Wired article on search engine optimization (SEO) and how Google are potentially leveling the playing field by placing more emphasis on the value of the the content on a website. Rather than clever coding and tagging tricks that have traditionally been used to enhance a website's position in a search they are saying that it is the quality and relevance of the content that is going to dictate its position. You can't really say fairer than that you have to admit.

In a way an analogy can be drawn with healthcare and the need to optimize a process that for decades has functioned in a very nontransparent way. You become unwell, visit a doctor, get treated and (hopefully) get better. The process then repeats itself the next time illness strikes. This episodic approach is possibly fine (but not optimal) for relatively minor ailments, but as we age and the likelihood of developing chronic diseases increases, this approach often falls short of delivering quality care. By comparison with other developed countries the United States routinely languishes near the bottom for mortality from most chronic diseases. 

Healthcare reform may go some way to redressing this aberration (how the richest country with the most expensive healthcare system can consistently perform so poorly compared with other industrialized nations), but providers of care also have to critically examine how they deliver care. This I believe is where significant optimization can occur.

There is the dawning of recognition in the medical community that every episode of care does not necessarily need to be conducted in a face-to-face setting, or indeed happen in real time. But counteracting any significant change in how medicine is practiced are the perverse incentives associated with a fee for service model for remunerating providers. This is gradually changing, with greater numbers of physicians being employed by larger systems, opting to practice concierge style medicine, or participating in accountable care organizations. This will eventually mean the fee for service model won't be as big an influencer on behavior as it is today. 

As this change gathers momentum there will be an increasing need to modernize the way medicine is practiced, because provider remuneration will be based on outcomes and patient satisfaction, and not just episodes of care. This I believe is where technology comes in. As I mentioned, not all interactions need to be carried out face-to-face, and in fact some may even be better for not being face-to-face. This is not just telemedicine (although I am sure that it has a significant role to play in the future of healthcare) it's about utilizing technology to create an ongoing connection between provider and patient.

Imagine if providers had a dashboard that would give them access to regular, current data on, for example, diabetic patients' blood sugars, or an asthmatic patients' peak flow readings? They would be able to be proactive in managing these conditions both at the individual level, but also at the population level. The step change from the episodic reactive way of managing patients to one where there is a real opportunity to be proactive and predictive would surely improve outcomes, reduce costs and lead to greater patient satisfaction.  

This is not just a fantasy. It is happening in the here and now. At nGage Health we're creating solutions that allow providers to capture data from their patients (using health assessments and popular apps and devices) and merge that data with salient information from the EHR to generate a real-time population-wide dashboard, and we'd love to tell you more.   

nGage Health's Provider Dashboard for Population Health Management